You spent weeks defining your content pillars. Five strategic themes that represent what your business is about, things like “innovation” or “our new product” or “team stories”.

You mapped them to your ideal customer journey, color-coded them in a spreadsheet, and felt organized for the first time in months.

Then real business happened.

Three prospects asked the same question about pricing in one week. A competitor spread misinformation about your industry. You had a breakthrough with a client that revealed something important about how buyers make decisions.

And suddenly you’re stuck in an impossible choice:

Do you break away from your content pillars to tell stories that actually matter? Or do you follow the pillars and sound disconnected from what’s happening in your business right now?

If you’re constantly breaking your own content rules to stay relevant, then your content strategy is probably broken.

The Two Problems with Content Pillars

When I worked in-house as a content strategist, I used to love the clarity of content pillars. But there were always problems that we had to work around, which is why I eventually gave up on pillars and now approach content planning differently.

Problem #1: You Have Ideas That Don’t Fit the Pillars

Real business is messy and dynamic. It doesn’t organize itself into five neat categories.

The best content ideas emerge from what’s happening NOW:

• Three prospects ask about pricing, and you realize there’s a gap in how buyers understand your value structure
• A competitor makes claims that misrepresent the industry, and you need to reframe the conversation
• A client implementation reveals something about buyer readiness that you’ve never articulated before
• You attend an event and learn something new that reframes your entire point of view.

These are the stories that actually connect with buyers, but they don’t always connect to your pillars.

So you face a choice: tell the story that matters (and break your rules), or follow your rules (and miss the moment).

Problem #2: You’re Constantly Hunting for Ideas to Fit the Content Pillars

Instead of being creative and organic, content creation becomes a “pillar-filling” exercise. You start looking for stories that match your pillars, potentially ignoring stories that would be way more interesting to buyers. Instead of approaching storytelling like an investigative reporter, you are acting like an intern who is paid on output, not quality.

• Google “innovation trends in [your industry]”
• Rehash a thought you’ve already shared six different ways
• Write something generic that technically fits the category but doesn’t say anything new
• Use AI to come up with something

Content creation becomes a burden, and it feels like an obligation, not an opportunity. And your readers can tell — they sense the lack of passion or interest. It feels like you checked a box.

The Deeper Problem: Content Pillars Are Self-Oriented

At the root, the problem with content pillars is that they are always about you. Instead of responding and engaging with your audience, you are just talking to talk or writing to write. There is no active interest in what is timely or relevant, it is just a game you play to earn SEO points.

But prospects don’t care about your SEO keyword or your competitive ranking. They are playing a different game entirely. What they want is information that answers their questions or educates them, whether it pops up first is search or not.

They are looking for content that addresses real problems and concerns, like:

• Risk (what if this doesn’t work?)
• Timeline (how long will this actually take?)
• Fit (do you understand our specific situation?)
• Alternatives (why not just hire internally, or go with the cheaper option?)
• Justification (how do I sell this to my CFO?)

I call this “buyer enablement”. It content that gives your buyers confidence to move forward, and helps them make the decision they already want to make. In short: it’s not about you.

This type of content resonates because it is bridging the gap between where your buyers are, their context, how they see and experience their problem, and your perspective and solution.

What Actually Works Instead: The Sonnet Principle

I was a creative writing major in college (and instead of becoming a best-selling novelist, I decided marketing was the best application of my degree, results are pending on the ROI of that choice). But, my point it — I’ve read and written a lot of poetry, and sonnets are one of my favs.

A sonnet has a rigid structure: 14 lines, specific rhyme scheme, iambic pentameter. The structure is non-negotiable, but the subject matters is infinite.

Shakespeare wrote sonnets about love, time, beauty, mortality, betrayal, legacy. You can use a sonnet to write about the sunrise, music, your dog, your breakfast. The structure does not limit creativity, it enables it. How? Because it gives you permission to focus on the subject matter, not the format.

That’s what your content strategy needs: structure without prescription.

Not a list of approved topics. Not a calendar that dictates what you talk about when. But a consistent storytelling framework that works for ANY topic that emerges from your business.

This is the difference between content structure and content strategy.

Content pillars try to prescribe WHAT you should talk about. Content strategy defines HOW to tell any story in a way that bridges the gap between how buyers see the problem and how you see it.

How to Tell Stories that Matter

Every piece of content should bridge the gap between how your buyer currently sees the problem and how you see it.

This means you can tell any story – the fun ones, the messy ones, the serious ones, the boring ones (well maybe not those), as long as your are closing a specific gap in understanding.

Here’s what this looks like in practice with a simple three-part structure:

1. Start Where Buyers Currently Are

Don’t open by explaining your solution or showcasing your expertise. Start by acknowledging the buyer’s current reality:

• What symptoms are they experiencing?
• What have they probably already tried?
• What assumptions are they making about the problem?

This is where you prove you understand their situation better than they do.

2. Reveal the Gap in Their Thinking

Now you can introduce your perspective. But not by jumping straight to “here’s what we do.”

Instead:

• Why didn’t their previous attempts work?
• What are they misunderstanding about the root cause?
• What shift in perspective needs to happen?

This is where you reframe how they see the problem and start to orient them towards your solution.

3. Guide Them Toward the Next Step

Finally, you can introduce your approach—but in the context of the gap you just revealed:

• How does your solution specifically address what they’re misunderstanding?
• What makes this different from what they’ve already tried?
• What should they do with this new understanding?

You can apply this structure to pricing, competitive positioning, implementation challenges, buyer readiness, industry trends, client success stories, anything.

The structure stays the same and the topics change based on what’s actually happening in your business.

What Happens Next

When you replace content pillars with content structure, everything shifts.

Instead of asking: “What topics should we cover this quarter?”

You ask: “What gaps in buyer understanding are preventing sales right now?”

Instead of planning: “We’ll post about Innovation on Tuesdays and Case Studies on Thursdays”

You respond: “Three prospects asked about pricing this week—what gap in understanding does that reveal?”

When something important happens in your business, you don’t need to check if it fits your content pillars.

You just need to ask:

• How does this connect to what our buyers are experiencing?
• What gap does this reveal in their current thinking?
• What’s our perspective on it that bridges that gap?

Then you tell that story.

Want More Examples?

Here are a few scenarios that demonstrate this in storytelling.

Three prospects ask about pricing

• “Most agencies I talk to think they’re too expensive. Their prospects keep choosing cheaper alternatives.”
• “The problem isn’t your pricing. It’s that you’re asking buyers to justify your value without giving them the language to do it.”
• “Here’s how to reframe pricing conversations so buyers understand the cost of NOT solving the problem.”

Competitor makes misleading industry claim

• “You’ve probably seen claims that [industry trend] will solve [common problem].”
• “It won’t. Here’s what these claims miss: [diagnostic insight about root cause].”
• “If you’ve already tried [trend] and it didn’t work, here’s why—and what to do instead.”

Client implementation reveals insight about buyer readiness

• “Most companies start projects before they’re actually ready. Then they blame the agency when it doesn’t go smoothly.”
• “The issue isn’t the project scope or timeline. It’s that no one diagnosed whether the internal team was prepared to implement.”
• “Here are the three conversations you need to have internally before you engage anyone.”

That’s content strategy that’s responsive instead of rigid. You are still strategic about you storytelling, but you are flexible and open to sharing the stories that matter most right now.

But do this first: You can’t always see which gaps need closing or identify the insights that close them. That requires extraction. Learn why the genius is already in your head—and how to extract it →

---

Ready to build a content strategy that doesn’t feel like a prison? Let’s talk about what’s happening in your business right now—and turn it into content that bridges the gaps preventing your best prospects from becoming clients. Set up a time to talk and we’ll start with what matters most: the stories your buyers actually need to hear.